The creature known as the Sasquatch, Bigfoot, Abominable snowman, Yeti and Yowie (to name a few) has been debunked and ridiculed by science for decades now. I am only going to say this once; "science wants physical proof of the creature, which could be bones or the whole body. Thoughout the years this evidence has not been collected and expeditions proven in vain. However, I have read the reports from all over the world, spoken with eyewitnesses who have seen the beast, read the books, seen various documentaries and have seen the sasquatch with my own eyes. Many characteristics repeat themselves, no matter what source you get information from. Because of this the negative opinions of the scientific community do not deter me in my search. One merely has to see with their own eyes to become a beleiver!" With that being said, the general opinion is beginning to change slowly. This is due to sightings on a daily basis from all over the world by people like you and I. In Canada the creature is known as the sasquatch and Manitoba has the second highest rate of sightings in the country, next to British Columbia / Alberta. If you read the quick facts about Manitoba it is easy to see why we have such a high index of sightings.
      After many hours of research in the library, internet and out in the field, I have started to put together maps and write articles. What is striking is that many of our sightings are in close proximity to each other. This is demonstrated in the northern Interlake area, near Easterville and Grand Rapids. I pursued some answers as to why and discovered that the area has a limestone geology, riddled with hundreds of caves. It would seem logical that if there were something out there, it could avoid detection by hiding in these caves. This area has the highest concentration of sightings in the province.
To illustrate my point here are 2 maps. Population density vs. vegetation cover.

To sum it up, I believe there is a sasquatch population out there. At the age of ten I had a terrifying encounter, and have been searching for years now. Could it be coincidence that people from all over the world describe the same thing and they do not know each other? I think not. There are too many eye-witness sightings now to call it a hoax! There is lots of physical evidence also, such as footprints. As each day goes by, and more evidence is gathered it can't be ignored anymore. The day will come when a sasquatch is captured.

I have a theory that is being lookied into right now. When an area burns the wildlife population moves on to a new area to feed. The predators follow of course. The goal is to find any corrrelations between wildlife migration and sasquatch sightings. This is a major task and will take time to complete. Will keep you posted.

One night I accidentally turned a picture into a negative in photoshop. The background in the picture became a lot easier to see. Look for yourself....

As you can see the regular picture looks normal, but you can't see anything beyond the brush. In the enhanced picture anything dense beyond the normal line of sight is dark blue to black. This seems to be a good tool and will use it from now on.

Strange comaprison of foot prints

There is an interesting correlation between the Fouke, Arkansas prints and prints seen in Poplar River, Manitoba. Foot casts taken in both locations had only 3 toes. There are several hundred Kilometres separting these two places, but it brings to mind many theories. Could this be the same creature or is there a distinct sub-species present? My research continues.